|

|

|

|

|

|

Partners

230 competitions documented	469 competitions listed
6 049 projects	61 864 documents

Advanced Search

MODELS + VIDEOS

PUBLICATIONS + OPEN ACCESS

Competitor

Miguel Escobar Architecte+Urbaniste

Le Triangle - Concours de design urbain Namur - Jean-Talon Ouest / The Triangle - Urban Design Competition Namur - Jean-Talon West

Stage 1

Stage 2

Presentation Panel

no1

Perspective

view of Paré street from Victoria avenue

Perspective

view of Paré street towards Victoria avenue

Perspective

view of Victoria avenue from Jean-Talon street

Plan

intervention area

Plan

closeup the planning concept

Section

Victoria avenue between de la Savane and Paré streets, towards de la Savane street

Section

Buchan street toward Victoria avenue

Section

Paré street towards Victoria avenue

Schema

components of the plan

Schema

functions of public space on Victoria Avenue

GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE COMPETITOR

Competitor	Miguel Escobar Architecte+Urbaniste
	www.futurecities.ca

Manager	Miguel Escobar
Team	Marie-Claire Martineau
	Miguel Escobar
Doc. level	75%

Description

Stage 2

The first floor of the buildings would allow for the insertion of commercial spaces in order to provide local services to the residents and create animation in the neighborhood.

Bicycle path
The proposed bicycle path on de la Savane Street will be built on Paré Street instead, thus skirting the new linear park and connecting it to the two metro stations, Namur and de la Savane.

Bixi
Bixi stations will be planned along the new bike path.

(Competitor's text)

(Unofficial automated translation)

Jury Report

My Snow District

In the first stage of the competition, the proposal that preceded this service was selected for the following reasons an assertive entrance to the neighbourhood from Victoria Avenue, which enters the sector in depth; a well-resolved internal circulation loop; the close relationship of the building to the street; a fairly accurate scale of the public space; the decision to completely free up Savane Park; the potential for a better connection between Paré Street and Victoria Avenue; the division of the super-islands by the addition of pedestrian and vehicular routes, producing a finer grid.

On the other hand, the jury expressed reservations regarding : the unconvincing road layout, particularly with the addition of a lane that increases the presence of the automobile rather than reducing it; the unclear links between the center of the sector and its periphery; the dubious benefit of the widening of Paré Street, with a central island surrounded by two vehicular lanes, the occupancy of which is unlikely and the advantages of which are not well understood; poor formal and spatial articulation and the lack of continuity between Paré Street and Victoria Avenue.

When it came time to make an initial judgment on the performance of this proposal, the jury was unanimously disappointed to note the lack of development of the project, the few improvements made in relation to the previous stage, the addition of certain solutions that were less convincing than in the first stage - in particular, the unresolved and unwelcome traffic circle - as well as the general level that fell short of expectations. The hearing allowed the jury to confirm the impression that this performance was significantly out of step with the rest of the project, both in terms of the ideas behind it and its rendering.

(From jury report)

(Unofficial automated translation)

List of accessible documents

33 scanned / 28 viewable

Presentation Panel
Perspective
Perspective
Perspective
Plan
Plan
Section
Section
Section
Schema
Schema
Presentation Panel
Presentation Panel
Perspective
Perspective
Perspective
Perspective
Perspective
Plan
Plan
Plan
Plan
Plan
Plan
Section
Section
Section
Elevation

IMPORTANT NOTICE : Unless otherwise indicated, photographs of buildings and projects are from professional or institutional archives. All reproduction is prohibited unless authorized by the architects, designers, office managers, consortiums or archives centers concerned. The researchers of the Canada Research Chair in Architecture, Competitions and Mediations of Excellence are not held responsible for any omissions or inaccuracies, but appreciate all comments and pertinent information that will permit necessary modifications during future updates.
info@ccc.umontreal.ca

Production

Partners