The jury considered this submission to have a philosophical affinity with Submission 13 which won an award. Another simple grid layout, with open space in a rough spine formation, it laid out most of the buildings close to the ground. The jury admired the clarity of the idea but found Submission 8 over-regimented, and lacking in open space like Sub-mission 6, which won recognition. At the same time, they found the sectional organization of the dwelling units, from foundations right through to roof forms, unrealistically complex and costly.
(From jury report)
18 scanned / 14 viewable
- Section
- Section
- Section
- Section
- Presentation Panel
- Presentation Panel
- Presentation Panel
- Site Plan
- Plan
- Section
- Section
- Section
- Section
- Section