(Click french version to read a description of the project)
This submission presented considerable difficulties for the jury, since they admired many of its qualities, but it failed to provide adequate data on density and mix calculations. To the best of the ability of the professional adviser and the jurors to establish accurate statistics, the submission failed to meet the density requirements, falling some 16 per cent short. The jury discussed the status of Submission 10 at considerable length. Its site planning was well regarded, balancing the needs of vehicular access with those of landscaped open space; its unit plans were both sensible and sensitive. Its architectural expression was regarded highly by ail the jurors.
In view of these many virtues, the jury agreed that it would award a mention to the submission, notwithstanding its failure to demonstrate its compliance with the requirements of the competition.
(Excerpt from the jury's comments)
9 scanned / 5 viewable
- Site Plan