|

|

|

|

|

|

Partners

230 competitions documented	469 competitions listed
6 049 projects	61 864 documents

Advanced Search

MODELS + VIDEOS

PUBLICATIONS + OPEN ACCESS

Competitor

Menkès Shooner Dagenais LeTourneux Architectes

Bibliothèque de Drummondville / Drummondville Library

Presentation Panel

01

Presentation Panel

02

Presentation Panel

03

Perspective

01

Perspective

02

Perspective

03

Perspective

04

Perspective

05

Perspective

06

Perspective

07

Perspective

08

Perspective

09

Perspective

10

Site Plan

Site plan

Plan

Ground Floor

Plan

Second Floor

Section

East-West

Section

North-South

Elevation

East

Elevation

North

Elevation

West

Elevation

South

Schema

Context

Schema

Programmatic blocks

Schema

Seasonal events

Schema

Uses

Schema

Opportunities and constraints

Schema

Break in links

Schema

Affirmation of links

Schema

Fluidity of exchanges

Schema

Unifying plate

Schema

Creation of a versatile course

Schema

Structure of the circulation axis

Schema

Segmentation and improvement of the program

Schema

Integration of the pedestrian path

GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE COMPETITOR

Competitor	Menkès, Shooner, Dagenais, LeTourneux architectes
	www.msdl.ca

Doc. level	75%

Description

Jury Report

Provided by: Menkès Shooner Dagenais LeTourneux Architects
- The project as a whole is well mastered and we note a good urban insertion.
- Despite the explanations concerning the unifying plate, the jury remains very skeptical about its actual functioning. In addition to its high cost, it is difficult to see how recreational activities can coexist with the parking function. During events on this plaque, where would the participants park? It is also noted that this is a parking lot where maneuvering can be difficult due to dead ends in each lane. This project requires the acquisition of the adjacent lot for the development of the unifying plaque.
- The building's location appears to have been wedged towards the adjacent shopping center to make room for the unifying plate.
- The future expansion of the Drummondville Historical Society is clearly demonstrated.
- The outdoor green bleachers are an attractive feature. It is noted, however, that they would probably not be used for spectators at the skating rink in winter.
- The positioning of the service building for the skating rink leaves the jury puzzled. Is this the type of building that should be present on Lindsay Street?
Its use is not complementary to those present on this commercial artery.
- The delivery area presents an access or exit problem as maneuvering will have to be done on the public road due to the lack of space to turn a vehicle.
- The employee entrance is very far from the parking lot. It is anticipated that employees will use the main entrance instead.
- The architectural treatment is appreciated but not enthusiastic. We perceive a certain similarity with the future Drummondville Fair Center.
- The building is described as conventional. A more marked conceptual effort was expected.
- The technical concepts are simple and the jury finds it a reassuring and risk-free proposal for the building. The choice of materials used is interesting.
- This project is recognized as the one that most respects the program in terms of internal functioning. However, the interior spaces are very sober and without impressive volume.
- The location of the café near the terminus is an asset.
- The openings in the floor of the first floor are not significant. A special treatment of the staircase would have been desirable.
- The shelving arrangement on the floor is monotonous, but it is noted that the flexibility of the space can offer other arrangements.
- The layout of the blue room is appreciated, however access with a cart full of books can be difficult. An adaptation of the elevator could allow better access.
- The jury appreciates the design and treatment of the circulation desk.
- The fluidity of the interior circulation is positively underlined.
- The proposed sustainable development measures will allow the objectives to be achieved.
- The cost estimate presented is within the targeted budget.

(From jury report)

(Unofficial automated translation)

List of accessible documents

35 scanned / 35 viewable

IMPORTANT NOTICE : Unless otherwise indicated, photographs of buildings and projects are from professional or institutional archives. All reproduction is prohibited unless authorized by the architects, designers, office managers, consortiums or archives centers concerned. The researchers of the Canada Research Chair in Architecture, Competitions and Mediations of Excellence are not held responsible for any omissions or inaccuracies, but appreciate all comments and pertinent information that will permit necessary modifications during future updates.
info@ccc.umontreal.ca

Production

Partners