RE-Making architecture's territory
by Jean-Pierre Chupin
, published 2006-11-01
Montreal «City of Design», Quebec «Land of Architecture»? The touring exhibition produced for the L.E.A.P. by Denis Bilodeau and for the UQAM Design Centre by Marc Choko and Georges Labrecque does not dispense such simple expressions. It is an extensive project that seeks to grasp nearly 15 years of cultural architecture in Quebec from 1991 to 2005.
Presented until December 17 in Montreal, before heading to Rimouski, Chicoutimi, Paris, etc., this retrospect relates the phenomena of architectural competitions, still rather humble in Quebec and even more so throughout Canada, with «territorial imagination»- which is more deeply rooted. At a time when architectural exhibitions are desperately seeking to become «events» by addressing as little as possible the concrete aspects of architecture (which are not always gleaming, at times far from it), at a moment where political powers are discovering that there is «design» right in front of their noses and that it could contribute to «corporate image», it was important to the L.E.A.P. that we lead an attentive scheme that would seriously compare several dozen projects, whether they were constructed or not. The accustomed browser of the Canadian Competitions Catalogue will undoubtedly recognize a number of these projects, however until now; a comparative analysis was unavailable, as well as a synoptic view, or as photographer Pierre Lahoud would say: «an aerial view!»
In this November update, the CCC presents in detail the three projects conceived by three teams that are among the most active in Quebec, for the Centre de production des arts de la scène Jean-Besré competition (2004) in Sherbrooke. Two of these three projects caught the eye of Stéphane Baillargeon, a journalist at Le Devoir, who in a full page spread published on Saturday, November 18, emphasizes these «salvos of hope». Territory is not always an easy thing for architects to handle, often seeking openness, sometimes choosing withdrawal; they easily confuse territory with «backyard» Over-occupied as they often are with project and construction site details, architects sometimes forget to «consider the bigger picture», or the ways in which their intervention is linked to other architectures. We hope that this traveling exhibition and its richly illustrated catalogue help architects at the least, to re-mark, with a renewed vision, the territory of architecture.
Presented until December 17 in Montreal, before heading to Rimouski, Chicoutimi, Paris, etc., this retrospect relates the phenomena of architectural competitions, still rather humble in Quebec and even more so throughout Canada, with «territorial imagination»- which is more deeply rooted. At a time when architectural exhibitions are desperately seeking to become «events» by addressing as little as possible the concrete aspects of architecture (which are not always gleaming, at times far from it), at a moment where political powers are discovering that there is «design» right in front of their noses and that it could contribute to «corporate image», it was important to the L.E.A.P. that we lead an attentive scheme that would seriously compare several dozen projects, whether they were constructed or not. The accustomed browser of the Canadian Competitions Catalogue will undoubtedly recognize a number of these projects, however until now; a comparative analysis was unavailable, as well as a synoptic view, or as photographer Pierre Lahoud would say: «an aerial view!»
In this November update, the CCC presents in detail the three projects conceived by three teams that are among the most active in Quebec, for the Centre de production des arts de la scène Jean-Besré competition (2004) in Sherbrooke. Two of these three projects caught the eye of Stéphane Baillargeon, a journalist at Le Devoir, who in a full page spread published on Saturday, November 18, emphasizes these «salvos of hope». Territory is not always an easy thing for architects to handle, often seeking openness, sometimes choosing withdrawal; they easily confuse territory with «backyard» Over-occupied as they often are with project and construction site details, architects sometimes forget to «consider the bigger picture», or the ways in which their intervention is linked to other architectures. We hope that this traveling exhibition and its richly illustrated catalogue help architects at the least, to re-mark, with a renewed vision, the territory of architecture.
